This site is a beta. Nothing is deployed to a network and no figure here is a real balance.

Skip to main content
POTUSFI
All docs

Governance

Proposals, timelocks, risk tiers and the limits on emergency power.

Spec: README Sections 29-39, 65-67, 86-106

Governance controls borrow rates, collateral factors, liquidation thresholds, supply caps, the reserve factor and treasury allocation. Because those levers are real, membership is finite — 20,500 GOV NFTs — and it moves only through a protocol auction rather than the open market.

GOV Holder → Proposal → Voting Delay → Voting Period
   → Quorum Check → Passed → Timelock → Execution

Risk tiers

Not every parameter deserves the same ceremony. A liquidity incentive and a change to the borrow cap are not comparable decisions, and treating them identically either paralyses routine work or under-protects the dangerous kind.

TierExamplesRequirement
1 — LowLiquidity incentives, minor fees, UI configNormal governance
2 — MediumInterest rates, collateral caps, LTV, thresholdsHigher quorum, longer timelock
3 — HighThe borrow cap, pool reserves, upgrades, oracle changes, new collateralSupermajority, long timelock, safeguards

Emergency guardian

CanCannot
Pause borrowingMove pool funds
Pause new collateralWithdraw treasury
Pause the seat saleChange governance
Pause a compromised assetChange ownership

Concentration risk

Because GOV controls monetary policy, voting concentration is itself a protocol risk. Top-holder distribution, delegated voting power, quorum and proposal thresholds are tracked so no single holder can quietly accumulate control of monetary policy through the auction.